I was
sitting at a light, and the guy in front of me had a “Dude Abides” bumper
sticker, and having just watched The Big
Lebowski not long before, I couldn’t help thinking that the Dude doesn’t, really. All due respect to Jeff Bridges – who’s
terrific in pretty much everything he does, Hell and High Water only the most
recent example – Lebowski dates
really badly. On the other hand, Miller’s Crossing seems timeless. This is to take two examples from the Coen oeuvre.
Robert Towne. Tequila Sunrise, from 1988, is stuck
there;
You
could say that Miller’s Crossing and
Bogart
went from second leads to movie star with High
Sierra, in 1940 (even if he’s actually billed second, after Ida
Lupino). He did Falcon in ‘41, and
The first cut of the picture has more Martha Vickers (the little sister), and less Bacall. Hawks went back and shot extra scenes, and recut the movie. Vickers got less screen time, Bacall got more, by about twenty minutes. It made Bacall’s career, and Martha Vickers never got another part as good, to make it up to her. The plot actually makes less sense, in the re-edited version; Carmen, the baby sister, turns out in the book to have murdered Sean Regan (spoiler alert), but they had to change the ending for the movie, so the whole thing doesn’t hang together. None of this matters. The picture is dreamlike: Hawks later remarked that the audience reaction made him realize that if you kept things moving fast enough, nobody cared whether any of it made sense. This isn’t quite true. The plot almost comes together. You paper over the holes because of your giddy pleasure in its exhilarating surface tension.
My point about The Big Sleep being contemporary to its own era is that an audience back then would recognize both specific detail and things left unspoken. They’d notice, for example, the gas ration stickers on Marlowe’s windshield – the war was only just over. They’d realize that when Dorothy Malone pulls the shades and pours Marlowe a drink, there’s more on offer than just what’s in the glass. They’d know what the cop, Bernie Ohls, was on about when he says about Sean Regan, “Oh, you mean the ex-legger Gen. Sternwood hired to do his drinking for him?” (They weren’t that far removed from Prohibition, and Repeal.) They could figure out what kind of books Geiger was selling, in brown paper wrappers, and why Carmen was vulnerable to blackmail, and what the relationship was between Geiger and Carol Lundgren, the kid who cleans up after the murder, and dresses the dead man in his Chinese pyjamas, and lays him out on the bed. None of it had to be spelled out.
There’s also the still-shocking violence. The death of Elisha Cook. The moment in the garage, Canino flipping the roll of coins in his hand, Marlowe taken by surprise, his arms pinned to his sides with the spare tire, and Canino with the sucker punch, straight to the jaw – Canino opens his balled fist, and the loose coins spill out. And the killing of Canino himself, as cold-blooded as anybody could get away with, at the time.
The
test, I think, is whether we recognize their attitudes as like ours, their choices, their motives, their reactions,
not so much the fashions in clothes, as their manner. Do they feel genuine to us? I think Marlowe does. I’m not a big fan of
Bacall, too, is a very assured presence. You get the feeling that the characters, as thin as the script is, have a sense of their own back story, and don’t need to fill it in for us. Hawks, knowing he’s onto a good thing, gives her the last word. Bogart is finishing up the story, what’s happened and what has to happen next, and Bacall tells him he’s forgotten one thing: her. What’s wrong with you? he asks her. “Nothing you can’t fix,” she says.