Another
movie post, because I’m still in the geosynchronous orbit of Tarantino’s brain
candy, Cinema Speculation.
Brit noir hit its stride in the immediate postwar years, just as American film noir did, but the Brits had an extra serving of world-weary. American tough-guy pictures in the late 1940’s laid on the cynicism and corruption, with no small helping of conspiracy and nuclear paranoia (Kiss Me Deadly took the atom bomb metaphor literally); the British style was more inward and furtive, and just plain creepy. American noir was about lost innocence, Brit noir was about losing your soul.
Carol Reed directed Odd Man Out in 1947, The Fallen Idol in ‘48, and The Third Man in ‘49, which is three for three. Along about the same time, Brighton Rock, with a screenplay by Graham Greene and Terence Rattigan, made Richard Attenborough a star in his early twenties. No Orchids for Miss Blandish – called “the most sickening exhibition of brutality, perversion, sex and sadism ever shown,” a review that only baits the hook - broke box office records.
They
were doing something right. This was the
period that saw David Lean’s two terrific Dickens adaptions, Great Expectations and Oliver Twist, and the heartbreaking Brief Encounter. The famous and successful Ealing comedies, Kind Hearts and Coronets, Passport to Pimlico, and Whisky Galore! – released in the
Crime
pictures seem to come in cycles. Heist
movies are always in fashion, for example, but after the late 1940’s, Brit noir took a sabbatical, and then came
back with a roar in the early Sixties.
Stanley Baker in The Criminal
(why was Stanley Baker never that big a star outside the
Not to mention the beginning of Bond, with Dr. No, and spy stories suddenly in vogue. Again, the more kitchen-sink, hard-luck, wiseguy pictures took a back seat, glamorous and exotic was in.
And then came the ‘70’s.
Villain,
Richard Burton in a remake of White Heat,
all the gay subtext upfront and center – with Ian McShane, of all people, as
Big Dick’s boytoy. The way McShane tells
the story, Richard told him, “You remind me of
Which brings us to Get Carter, released in 1971. First off, Michael Caine. Introduced to major audiences in Zulu, he slipped effortlessly through the keyhole with The Ipcress File (not to be upstaged by seasoned pros like Gordon Jackson and the impeccably reptilian Nigel Green), and Alfie made him a bankable star. The thing to remember about Michael Caine is that he was ours, it felt like he belonged to us, that cheeky attitude, and the accent. For a generation of a Brit kids (not that I’m one), he turned the class system – where the way you speak is destiny – inside out. He was a bloody Cockney, and he was suddenly the new archetype, much to his own surprise. Secondly, the source material, a hard-boiled pulp novel by Ted Lewis called Jack’s Return Home, which rocketed to commercial success, and almost single-handedly established the Brit neo-noir. Third, there was the director, Mike Hodges. Carter was his debut feature, and truth be told, he’s never made another movie as crackling and acid.
The story’s a revenge tragedy. Jack, the Michael Caine character, is muscle for the
Two things in particular stand out. One is that Michael Caine plays Jack without any apparent emotional affect. He isn’t simply remorseless; he has no sympathy for anybody. I’d never seen anything like it, and certainly not from Michael Caine. Almost always, a name actor will play to the audience, a nod and a wink, to show you the guy’s got a heart of gold under his gruff exterior. (There’s a moment in Sharky’s Machine, where Burt Reynolds breaks character and goes all Aw, Shucks! on you, and almost blows the whole picture. Burt, the director, shouldn’t have allowed Burt, the movie star, to pander.) Caine is having none of it. He doesn’t even pretend that Jack has an ounce of pity. There’s one moment, late in the story, where Jack is watching a dirty movie, and recognizes who’s in it – I can’t tell you who, without giving it away – but his face is impassive, while his eyes leak tears. Amazing bit, too. In context, it shows you that Jack isn’t in control, that his stony mask has a fatal cost, but even so, the mask never really slips. Jack has such a tight grip on himself, he can’t see he’s let his soul slip through his fingers.
The
second thing is the visual affect of
the picture, the way it’s shot. The
cinematographer said later his main contribution was the lighting and the
exposures, and that it was director Mike Hodges who was responsible for the
camera work, the shot setups and the look
of the film. (Which might remind you of
Ridley Scott, on The Duellists,
working as his own cameraman.) The visual
style, in Get Carter, is foreshortened
and claustrophobic. The movie starts
with a zoom in, against the
Get Carter cast a long shadow. You see its influence. It turned a corner, and afterwards you couldn’t go back. Probably its most direct heir is The Long Good Friday, with that other Cockney, Bob Hoskins. That’s another column.