I hardly ever listen to rap or polyphonic jazz. Okay, basically never. But I’m glad other people do, and want them to continue. You might wonder how I square this in my brain, and I can tell you. Easily.
![]() |
Charles Darwin |
Darwin figured this out in the 19th century. In order for nature to evolve, species had to pump out a lot of experiments, deviations from the norm, which biologists somewhat frighteningly call mutations. The vast majority of these oddities whither and die immediately. But some squeak through, and others, a tiny percentage, turn out to be better than the original product. Again, with a bit of luck, this success multiplies, until the whole species jumps on the bandwagon and its continued survival is thus temporarily assured.
I didn’t see any of the movies up for the Oscars this year. I didn’t like the sound of them, because I’m an old-fashioned movie-goer who likes what he likes and rarely shells out part of his fixed income on something designed to make him uncomfortable, confused or even challenged. This is a failing on my part, I admit, but I’m still glad these movies got made and were honored. Art, like nature, depends on experimentation to survive and thrive.
Most contemporary art leaves me
scratching my head. Maybe because the
artists aren‘t blood relatives. My son is
a professional artist and he never tries to do anything that’s been done
before. Because he’s my son, I look
closely at his work, and always find something to appreciate. This keeps me open to other efforts, and when
something crosses my path that gets to me, I’m grateful for the experience.
My favorite form of art is Impressionism. This stuff is now considered as homey and mainstream as a cardigan sweater, but when it first emerged, most people, and nearly all the commentators of the time, thought the artists were completely out of their minds. That turned out not to be true, Van Gogh notwithstanding. Art lovers simply had yet to adjust their eyes, minds and social constructs to absorb the work.
You could say the same thing about jazz and James Joyce. Cultural revolutions rarely blast on to the scene (I’d say the Beatles were the exception.) They come on little cat feet, slowing infiltrating our attention and devotion. The early innovators are usually disregarded into oblivion, sadly, but the victorious mutations they create are relentless and unstoppable.
The alternative is stagnation. Ironically, this is usually a side effect of
success. If everything is working for
you, there’s little incentive to change.
The French Academy was saturated with rewards, admiration and nice
granite galleries featuring their work.
The Impressionist rabble was likewise poor, denigrated and overlooked,
but they owned the energy of innovation, and eventually, the established art
culture just rotted away.
It’s not a stretch to attach the
same logic to biology. Everyone loves
Koala bears, but they only eat certain types of Eucalyptus leaves, and are thus
endangered as their food supply fluctuates.
Racoons, on the other hand, eat almost anything. We have no shortage of racoons, and there’d be
a lot more Koalas if they developed a taste for Vegemite sandwiches.
“Hey, let’s give it a try! What can it hurt?” This doesn’t always pan out, but it’s why humans rule the world today. There’s never been a more versatile and adaptive species. Like racoons, we eat almost anything. We’re not that strong, relative to polar bears or saber tooth tigers, but we amplify what we have with devices and machines. As such, we’re now not only the apex of the apex, but a threat to the planet’s survival. Too much of a good thing?
I don’t know what would qualify as
experimental writing these days, though I’m sure others do. I hope so.
I’m probably the least likely reader to discover the trends of the
future, since I feel the same way about novels and short stories as I do about movies. My diminishing timeline leaves
little room for branching out, dabbling in the Avant Garde. As with breakthroughs in quantum mechanics and
new records in the 100-meter dash, this is something better suited to the young.
Anyway, it’s their world that’s being quietly created, and theirs to relish.
Experimental writing? A lot of the most radical writing was done back in the days of Gertrude Stein, James Joyce, Joyce Cary, and many others... I know some people are working in the medium of tweets or FB threads or Instagram threads. Which is great, of course, except that in future, when the grid goes down or we go completely AI wetware, they'll all vanish. Nowhere near as solid as a novel in the hand or the ms in the scroll. Let's all continue on with our work and see what happens!
ReplyDeleteChris, I am grinning widely at this: "I’m an old-fashioned movie-goer who likes what he likes and rarely shells out part of his fixed income on something designed to make him uncomfortable, confused or even challenged." The real world does that enough to me! (uncomfortable, confused, and challenged.) These days, I really look for things that make me smile and feel good.
ReplyDelete