30 March 2025

Rat Paradise


You’ve heard and read a lot of doom and gloom asserting the population is declining thus leading to social and economic collapse. This is a follow-up to Eve’s article earlier this month, ‘What Nature Does Best’.

Growth is good, proselytizes the Chamber of Commerce. Growth is great, sayeth city fathers. No such thing as too much, blabs Peter Thiel, who likes to think he’s scary smart and who advocates for a global population of 1 trillion, a staggering 12,077% jump from 8.212 billion.

A surprising number of people don’t realize population isn’t declining but rather its rate of growth is leveling off. In other words, we’re easing off the accelerator but the bus is still picking up speed (differential calculus to you readers who snack on maths before breakfast). Even Elon Musk got it wrong in possibly a careless slip of the tongue.

Sexology 101

That’s subject to change about fifty years from now when predicted growth trends whisper to a halt and theoretically may start to rewind. Blame men. Worldwide male fertility has declined for decades. Researchers are convinced chemical air and water pollution is affecting male hormones.

In a climate change world of microplastics where wildlife and plant varieties are disappearing, that is worrisome. For the past three-quarters of a century, America’s Breadbasket, its farms and fields and groves, have been replanted with condos and strip malls. Our oceans are slowly turning to waste. A series of aerial photographs over Caracas illustrate the great jungles drying and dying.

Observers muse the planet is fighting back. Is Earth exerting a form of human pest control?

Inevitably, a question arises of men shunning sex: self-described incels, male separatist MGTOW, and that ilk, a phenomenon observed in many developed countries. I had surmised they represent an insignificant (apologies for the unfortunate word choice) percentage of the population, but I was wrong. Researcher Miriam Lindner estimates 39% of men choose to be single or celibate. However, she claims a staggering 62% of women are eschewing relationships with men. Can we spell WGTOW?

Sociology 201

As mentioned above, city fathers and urban mothers have long and loudly claimed ‘Growth is Good’ when promoting pet projects, which have a peculiar way of enriching those urban mothers and fathers. A balance can be good too, a robust, inflation-free economy can be a very good thing, especially when linked to discovery, technology development, and innovation. Those economic ideals are rare because of population growth. As we hatch new people, we need resources to feed them and places to put them.

Sections of New York University’s ‘soft science’ courses dealt with over-population, and a significant portion of related sociology and psychology delved into ‘prisonization’, the socialization process that occurs when individuals mold to the culture of the prison environment. Prison is an extremely hazardous and unnatural environment, a world of fear, a population of discards, an environment without the opposite sex, a large population day after day, decade after decade jammed within cold concrete walls with little mental stimulation. Professionals draw parallels with population imbalances in our world, where too many people who crunch into tight quarters exhibit extreme behaviors– psychological disorders, rape, loneliness, death, fear, disproportionate homosexuality, hopelessness, and in some jails, vile, moldy food despite federal requirements for nutrition and prohibitions against using food or lack thereof as punishment.

I can report on this only through study and research. Our true first-line heroine and expert is Eve Fisher, who lives and observes firsthand what I can only write about. The main point is that prisons offer a peek into ‘Stand of Zanzibar’ effects of overpopulation.

Rat Paradise 25.0

Eve’s description of John Calhoun’s work slightly differs in details from my long-ago reading, likely because Calhoun’s lab ran numerous population experiments with rats and mice. Mostly I refer to Universe 25, forty to fifty-some rodents in a 4⅓×3m enclosure. The gist remains the same: a rodent utopia in which creatures are provided with every conceivable comfort and protection. They were given a predator-free, temperature controlled enclosures with nesting a cornucopia of materials, nourishing foods, optional treats, and willing, fecund sex partners.

In this abundant environment, the critters fornicated like bunnies, gorged on food, and relished their perpetual vacation. As the population grew, aberrant behaviors broke out– violence, rape (eventually including same-sex assault), lack of mothering, signs of mental instability. At some point, rat residents lost interest in sex, socializing, even eating. They isolated until the colony died out. Poof! Gone, incels in the end.

A number of conclusions might be drawn beyond overpopulation. One might consider human’s need adversity to survive, goals to strive for. Progressives and conservatives (not necessarily left and right) might both be right in different ways, we need to advance but we need roots. We require wholesome, challenging work for our own well-being.

Am I suggesting a link between male and female incels, and a wind-down of population growth? No. Yes. Perhaps. Maybe. I don’t know. But I wouldn’t rule it out.

Wall-E © Disney

Behavioral Sink

The opening minutes of Disney’s 2008 Wall-E suggest Earth was devastated by an environmental disaster. However, as the movie transitions, the rest of the story reveals the underlying crisis, a storybook depiction of Calhoun’s mouse utopia.

Seriously? A couple of friends believe adult animation is intellectually demeaning for grownups, but I love a good story in any form. Apparently viewers and critics agree with a 95% approval. I highly recommend Wall-E for thought-provoking exercise and entertainment, with or without nourishing popcorn.



15 comments:

  1. I for one would like to see the world population decline even more rapidly. Haven’t we destroyed enough of the planet? Isn’t it time to give it a chance to recover?

    Edward Lodi

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Edward, I agree. We can't sustain this level of consumption of the Earth and its resources.

      Delete
  2. Here's another vote for Wall-E. And also for Flow, this year's animation Oscar winner

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have not seen it yet, Janice. I'll act on your recommendation.

      My friend Steve is a digital graphic artist. We used to watch animated movies together. As the audience filed out after, say, Monsters Inc, they probably wondered about our conversation as we discussed the math involved in moving the creatures' fur and the physics of the falls and tumbles.

      Delete
  3. Loved Wall-E (I even cried when Wall-E "died" and EVE rescued him).
    I'm all in for faster world population decline, too, because I believe we've actually passed the limit of sustainability (at least if we believe that everyone should have sufficient food, clothing, shelter, warmth, light, fuel, healthcare, etc.), not to mention the limit of compassion (since apparently fewer people than ever believe that everyone should have a sufficiency of what's needed for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. D'accord, Eve. Too many people never get a chance to master the lower levels of Maslow's hierarchy and too many are indifferent to that fact.

      In the intervening week, I updated the article in case you wish to check the changes. Thanks for the original article, Eve.

      Delete
  4. My apologies. We had a mix-up last week resulting in this post running for a few hours. Fortunately, Barb caught it abd Rob rescheduled this post for this weekend.

    ReplyDelete
  5. If various hormone disruptors are messing with the frogs, they are certainly messing with the people: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4586825/
    I also enjoyed Wall-E.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've heard of frogs and toads described as early warning environmental 'canaries'. I live with a canal behind my house, and we used to see tree frogs and hear bullfrogs, but their numbers have been reducing over time. Likewise, we never see fireflies any more. Scary.

      Delete
  6. Leigh, three of our combined five children are in their late 30s and have decided not to have children. It's the women, and here's what I'm told: if you are a mother, you are supposed to work full time, pull a second shift at home, and get paid less than a man. So sadly, I am not surprised to read the stat of 62% of women who are not having relations with men. How did we ever get this way?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That, Melodie, would take a cyclopedia to answer. Sadly, I know a LOT of people who have chosen not to bear children.

      Delete
  7. Two superb mystery writers, Sharon Bolton and J.K Rowling, have written crime novels that double as speculative fiction about what might happen when the resentment of incels toward women spirals out of control. And both are set in the UK, where violence imo is less embedded in the culture than it is in the US.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Both sound intriguing, Liz. I'll look for them.

      Delete
    2. The Sharon Bolton book is The Dark (2022). The JK Rowling book is the controversial The Ink-Black Heart, where imo a feminist message got drowned out by transgender politics—all smoothed over in the recently aired TV version on HBO Max, btw, which focused on the comic/gaming intellectual property theft aspect of a very complex novel and of course left out the group chat messages that in the book were essential to the solution to the mystery. If you haven't read the book, Leigh, I think you'll find it interesting, and the Bolton too as a great novel of suspense and a near-future nightmare.

      Delete
    3. Liz, I knew the Rowling novel was out (so to speak), but haven't read either and both sound interesting. Thanks for the heads up!

      Delete

Welcome. Please feel free to comment.

Our corporate secretary is notoriously lax when it comes to comments trapped in the spam folder. It may take Velma a few days to notice, usually after digging in a bottom drawer for a packet of seamed hose, a .38, her flask, or a cigarette.

She’s also sarcastically flip-lipped, but where else can a P.I. find a gal who can wield a candlestick phone, a typewriter, and a gat all at the same time? So bear with us, we value your comment. Once she finishes her Fatima Long Gold.

You can format HTML codes of <b>bold</b>, <i>italics</i>, and links: <a href="https://about.me/SleuthSayers">SleuthSayers</a>