Wondering what that title means? Well, the first two words are things I like to do. The third, I'm not so sure about.
I feel guilty saying it (so I usually don't), but I don't much like readings. That's not always true, of course--I've been to many readings I enjoyed. Much of it depends on the author and the book, or the subject of the book. What often happens, though, especially at book launches, is that I gladly stand in line to buy the author's book and then I sit and listen to him or her read to the group from the book I just bought, the very one I plan to read for myself when I get home. To me, that's like buying a movie ticket, settling into your theater seat, and then seeing a lengthy excerpt from what you're about to watch.
I had much rather have the author use that time to talk about the book she's written, or how it was written, or what inspired it, or some of her views on her past writing or her writing experiences in general. Sometimes that happens also, but not always. What I probably enjoy the most is the question/answer session, if there is one. I don't usually ask questions myself, but I always seem to learn something from what others ask, and the responses by the author.
Before you start thinking I'm a complete Grinch, I should say that I'm more likely to enjoy group readings, where several writers--some familiar, some not--read a short bit from their own stories or novels. In that case, I'm not usually sitting there listening to words that I myself plan to read later--unless I'm so impressed that I then rush out and purchase something by that author. One thing I especially like about group sessions is the fact that those readings are short. In my opinion, the one supreme rule about author readings is that they should be short.
For me, that goes both ways. I also don't usually enjoy reading aloud from my own writing. I realize it's often required and expected, and I've certainly done it when asked to, and I'm always grateful to have been asked to--but truthfully, I'm not overly fond of the sound of my voice. I find it hard, at times, to read aloud with the feeling and expression that seem to come so easily to some folks. Another thing is, I think the fiction that I write, since it was written with the intention of being seen on the page, is harder to convey when it's heard, in spoken words. Especially the dialog. Unless, of course, it's delivered by someone talented enough to do it well. Some of my stories that have been read for podcasts and other such presentations by professional readers or actors have sounded good, at least to me.
In what I suppose is a contradiction, I do like talking to groups of any size about writing, whether it's my own or the writing of others. I guess it's fortunate that I enjoy it, because I taught night classes in the writing and marketing of short stories for seventeen years at a local college. The fact is, I've always been fascinated by the writing process, especially fiction writing. And other writers seem to be interested in that as well.
Having said all of the above, I did do a reading this past Wednesday, at a library several hours away. They showed me a kind and warm welcome and I had a great time--but it wasn't only a reading. It was more of a presentation about mystery writing and my short-story writing, with a question-and-answer session and a booksigning afterward. I did at one point read some things from my latest book because they asked me to, but that wasn't the way the event was promoted, and thankfully no one made faces or blew raspberries or threw tomatoes during that part. Probably because I made sure to keep it brief.
What are your thoughts on author readings? Do you enjoy hearing writers read aloud from their own work--I know a great many people do--or would you rather they just talked about other things? Have you ever sat there thinking Okay, time to finish this up? Do you like to read aloud to a group from your own stories or novels or poetry? Do you initiate that, or is it something you do mostly because you're expected to? Some of my writer friends are also accomplished actors, and I suspect they enjoy doing readings, and do a fine job of it. What are some of your rules and preferences on the subject? Do you always try to leave enough time for Q&A? Please let me know in the comments. And don't worry, I expect a lot of disagreement on this.
I also have a self-imposed rule about my SleuthSayers posts, and since I'm approaching that upper-wordcount limit, I'll obey that rule now.
Over and out.
It's such a hot button topic, isn't it, John? I personally think most writers read for two long. Four minutes at most, is my rule, and three is better. Usually, it's better to read from the beginning of the book (if you can't capture attention at the beginning, then what are you doing? is my feeling) I find that since I write mainly comedic work, people buy my books when they hear me read. If I don't read, and they don't know of me, then I don't sell. I think people have to *hear* comedy to decide if it's for them. It doesn't matter how many awards or newspaper features I have; they want to decide for themselves.
ReplyDeleteMelodie, I agree--readings work much better, I think, if you read from the very beginning of the novel/story, instead of an excerpt from farther in. As for your readings, I remember hearing you say you've done a lot of stand-up comedy, so I'm sure you're great at reading aloud. I manage to get through it, but I don't think I'm good at it.
DeleteI suppose hearing it IS more important for comedy--I'd never thought of that before. Thanks as always!
I figured you meant "two long hours." Just kiddin'.
DeleteOops! that should be 'too' in the second line! I'll go to bed now...
ReplyDeleteJohn, I’m with you on this. I’d rather hear an author talk about her writing than hear her read from her book, and I never enjoyed reading from my own work. I loved giving talks about my books, with signings afterwards.
ReplyDeleteEdward Lodi
Glad to hear I'm not alone in this, Edward. Saying I don't like readings implies I don't want to support my fellow writers, and that's not true. As for our own readings, I too think having signings afterward (not beforehand) can work much better.
DeleteI have no fear about reading my own or others' work out loud, because I was raised in a world where everyone was expected to be able to do that with feeling and emphasis. So, I don't mind doing readings. I do keep it short when I do, though.
ReplyDeleteThat's good to hear, Eve--I'm sure you do an effective job of it. I'm not overly nervous during my own readings, but I just don't think I'm particularly good at it or that it really accomplishes anything. It's probably the "feeling and emphasis" that I have trouble with--I think my own written dialog (to use one example) comes across better on the page than when I try to read it aloud.
DeleteAs for keeping it short, I think that's always a smart thing to do.
I read aloud daily for 6-7 year olds, and it’s easily my favorite part of the school day…and theirs, too. I love reading aloud my own work (for adults) as well. I’ve only done a Noir at the Bar, which is a little different than an author reading in that the purpose is to read something to entertain, not to give a sample of your work—but the rules are the same. Bringing energy makes the time pass faster—even the shortest reading in a deadpan voice feels like forever. Pick an excerpt or story that fits the time frame and ends in a satisfactory or interesting place. And if you’re reading dialogue, make sure you add dialogue tags, even if there aren’t many in the written work…your listening audience may have trouble understanding who’s talking.
DeleteAshley Bernier
I'm right with you, Ashley. Years of reading aloud to my kids has convinced me that it is an art form of its own with its own skillset and its own learning curves. Dialog is definitely the trickiest part, and distinguishing interiority from dialog often necessitates advanced narration skills and/or an extra dialog tag here and there.
DeleteI must confess, I've been bored to tears and embarrassed for the author at readings that did not begin or end comprehensibly, ran long, or were delivered in a monotone. It shows a lack of respect for the art of narration and for the audience.
Living in Massachusetts, I've been lucky enough to attend author events MCed by Hank Phillippi Ryan. No one does it better. She engages the audience with unique details about the book and the author's journey, then SOMETIMES reads a page or two relevant to the discussion.
Noir at the bar events are a the time to bust out your flash fiction unless your longer piece has segments which truly satisfy in isolation.
Thanks for a great post, John.
-Avram
Ashley, I envy you the ability to read well and comfortably in front of an audience. I agree that when it's done well, it's great--and I bet most schoolteachers are good at that! As for me, I'd much rather talk about what I do than read the result to others. Hey, keep doing what you're doing!!
DeleteAvram, I've never attended a Noir at the Bar, but I'm sure they're a lot of fun. Yes, I would think that would be the ideal time to break out some of the flash stories--do an entire story at one reading! (In fact, I have done that, a couple of times.) And I agree that Hank is terrific--I was able to meet and visit with her a bit at a New Orleans Bouchercon a few years ago--but I've never attended one of her author events. I did attend one of your fellow Massachusetts writers' events a few years ago--Dennis Lehane, though I think he lives in California now--and he too is a great reader.
Thanks, both of you, for stopping in at SleuthSayers.
Let me take a moment to remind writers that "Over and out" is always wrong except when John uses it. When a radio system allows only on speaker at a time, saying "Over" means "I'm done talking, your turn now," and "Out: means "I'm done talking, Goodbye." Saying "Over and out" means, "You can talk now, but I won't be listening." I know John listens.
ReplyDeleteJim, a much better way for me to say that would have been "I'll shut up now."
DeleteI've only read like this once. When I get another chance, I will remember your good advice.
ReplyDeleteThe only advice I know is to not read until you're getting glares from the audience or they start dozing off and falling out of the chairs. I think Melodie's three-minute rule might be a good one to follow.
DeleteI've only attended virtual author events, to be honest.
ReplyDeleteIn those, Justin, you can just turn off your video and doze awhile, if the need arises.
DeleteAuthor readings...not a fan
ReplyDeleteThe best I've heard was done by Elmore Leonard. Like his stories, short and direct. His humor added to the very short synopsis of the book he was hawking. He, perhaps, more interesting. Can't say that about other authors...usually the reverse.
I'd rather do a chat session if asked. Not one to read aloud to others what I write....awful. I would rather ask someone else to read, listen to their voice interpretation than hear my own thoughts or voice. But when I'm very famous, I'll let you know how those readings go. Until then, I'll listen to John Floyd read....
Hey Wil! I too have heard Leonard read (Djibouti, I think, or maybe it was Road Dogs), and yes, I enjoyed that. He kept it short, and he had long been one of my heroes at the time I attended that signing. I also agree with you on chat sessions. Talking about writing is fun in just about any situation or venue.
DeleteYou aren't famous already???
I've always thought there were rules, and not such bad ones. At a poetry reading, read poems. Three poems = five minutes. A set is twenty minutes max. If you have a novel, do a book talk. If people want to know what's in the novel, let them buy the book. Short story readings are always almost group events. I've been required to read for periods ranging from 90 seconds to eight minutes. In each case, I start at the beginning if I can, pick a good punch line, and cut all but the most entertaining material in between, usually mostly dialogue, to make it fit the allotted span. It helps that I love to perform and (she said modestly) do it well. As I'm sure Melodie will agree, there's nothing more rewarding than hearing an audience laugh.
ReplyDeletePS Equally rewarding: the quality of silence when they're moved.
DeleteLiz, I didn't know that, about the time rules for poetry readings--but I like the part about trying to begin story readings at the beginning. Most of my own readings have been at book launches of my short-story collections, and in each of those I picked something from one of the stories that was really short. (Hey, the stories themselves are short, right?)
DeleteI have no doubt you're good at readings. You, and Melodie too, are performers, and that makes a big difference. (I played your CD again not long ago, by the way.)
Thanks as always!
An ex-boyfriend was the featured poet at a poetry slam & he was reading & talking for at least an hour. I have very few published short stories & no novels. But some time back I had to do a presentation about producing a nonfiction book. The time limit was 35 minutes & I practiced what I was going to say in my hotel room for a night or two, until I got it right. After my speech I answered two or three questions & it wasn't terrible.
ReplyDeleteOf course it wasn't terrible--I'm sure you did a fine job. Congratulations on the book!
DeleteI suspect it helped you to know the time limit, etc., beforehand, and sounds as if you did a lot of good preparation for your talk.
As for your ex-boyfriend, I'm afraid there's no way I could survive attending a poetry reading if one reader took an hour to deliver the goods, but that's probably just me.
Keep up the great writing, Elizabeth!