Lately I've been writing a good many historical stories--most of them crime stories--and I'm only sorry I didn't start doing it sooner.
A word of clarification, here. When I say historical, I'm not talking so much about the Stone Age or ancient Rome or medieval England. I'm referring more to the past two hundred years or so, and mostly here in this country.
How did I get interested in this? I blame it on a number of period-specific mystery anthologies edited by folks like Michael Bracken, Andrew McAleer, and others. Contributing to those anthologies has forced me to write a dozen or more stories so far about crimefighters (usually PIs) in the 1930s, '40s, '60s, '70s, and '80s, and at first I couldn't believe how much fun they were to write. By now I'm used to it– and I'm still having a good time. Part of it's the writing, and part of it's learning what's needed about long-ago people, places, and events.
Not that all my historical-mystery shorts have been set in the mid-20th Century. Since I grew up watching endless Westerns on TV and the big screen, I've written and published plenty of those as well, around seventy or eighty stories so far. (You might be surprised at how many of our current mystery magazines are receptive to tales of the Old West– I've had Westerns published at AHMM, Strand, Black Cat Weekly, Mystery Magazine/Mystery Weekly, Black Cat Mystery Magazine, Punk Noir, Pulp Modern, Crimeucopia, Sherlock Holmes Mystery Magazine, even the print edition of The Saturday Evening Post. After all, if you stop and think about it, almost every Western features a built-in crime or two.)
My latest historical mystery appears in the July/August 2024 issue of Alfred Hitchcock's Mystery Magazine. It's called "Moonshine and Roses," it's set in the hills of eastern Kentucky in the 1930s, and it features treasury agent Joe McIinnis, who works for Eliot Ness's Alcohol Tax Unit in Cincinnati. The real star of the story, though, is the long-lost love of McInnis's life, the tough daughter of a moonshiner whose enemies are the official reason for a Fed to be poking around in the area. Maybe because it's a love story and a mystery and a shoot-'em-up adventure story as well, I've had some kind feedback on it from readers already, which always gladdens my doubt-filled heart. If you read it, I hope you'll like it.
The "twist" I mentioned in the title of this post is also a part of my Hitchcock story, mainly because I can't seem to resist inserting plot twists whenever I can. By the way, I think they work best when the entire story doesn't depend on the twist, and when the surprise provides a final "gotcha" onto the end of an already satisfying conclusion. (Think Die Hard, instead of The Sixth Sense.) Doing that kind of add-on ending (sometimes called a "double twist") isn't always possible, or even advisable--but with a little prior planning and foreshadowing, it often is, and when it works, I think it can help the story.
Questions: Do you write, and/or like to read, historical mysteries (novels or short stories)? In your opinion, how far back must you go, to be able to call a story historical? Is it cheating a bit, to use the too-recent past? How about Westerns? How about the amount of research that's required with any kind of period fiction? Do you do a lot of study beforehand, or are you already familiar enough with certain eras to write accurately about them? How about historical series stories? With regard to twist endings, do you often incorporate those into your fiction? Has that been successful for you? Do you like to encounter those kinds of reversals in the stories of others?
Whatever kinds of stories you create--present-day or historical, straightforward or convoluted, standalone or series--I wish you the best, with all of them.
Write on!
Oh damn. I got busy (or lazy) and let my AHMM subscription lapse. Curses!
ReplyDeleteI did a historical for Josh and another for Michael. 1978 doesn’t seem like much of a historical but if I say Truckstop Salvation was set nearly a half century ago, yeah, I argue it’s historical. Josh even caught an anachronism– glowsticks I mentioned didn’t become commercial until a year or so later.
John, you and I shared stories in Prohibition Peepers. Dime Detective, set in 1932. I put in a lot of research, which was fun. I mapped out a timeline of historical events to keep sequences correct.
I’ve written 3-4 Westerns. I must consult with you about markets, but I need to get them off the shelf. Westerns provide a unique story-telling vehicle, one that’s difficult to render in other genres.
Congratulations on your most recent! I need to get my AHMM/EQMM subscriptions back in gear!
Hi Leigh. Yep, sometimes it depends on how you say it. Our 52nd wedding anniversary's coming up next month, and it doesn't seem we've been married that long until you think "more than half a century." And yes, Prohibition Peepers was one of those opportunities that shoved me backward out of my comfort zone--and probably you too. But when the writing started, it was great fun.
DeleteAs for Western markets, I was serious when I said most current mystery markets seem receptive to them. (Except, in my case, EQMM.) One of my Westerns even made it into an edition of Best American Mystery Stories. That surprised me, but it verified to me that they can indeed be considered crime fiction. I like so many things about Westerns--the great settings, the stricter sense of honor and loyalty, the stark difference between right and wrong, etc. They're sort of unique in that way, but--as one of our mutual friends said to me not long ago--Westerns are just historicals with horses.
Thanks as always for your thoughts, Leigh. If your subscription doesn't pick up in time, get thyself to a bookstore!
I've really written only one true historical, and it was a Western - set in 1880s South Dakota - "A Time to Mourn". I need to do some more of them. And I loved "Moonshine and Roses"!
ReplyDeleteThank you, Eve--so glad to hear you liked the story.
DeleteI haven't read your Western--was that one of your AHMM stories? If so, what issue?--and if not, where can I find the story? I just finished re-watching the entire Deadwood series, done by HBO a few years ago, and loved it. LOTS of Western history in that end of South Dakota.
We just watched "Dolemite Is My Name," starring Eddie Murphy, on Netflix. It takes place in the 1970s & I figured it was made in the 1990s or thereabouts, but it turned out to have been made in 2019. I was in hospitals/nursing homes most of that year & so I was unaware of what movies came out. I don't suppose it would meet the strict definition of a historical but it was lots of fun.
ReplyDeleteElizabeth, I do wonder how far back "historical fiction" goes. I mean, the '70s were fifty years ago, so I suppose it qualifies. It's sort of hard for me to feel that anything that happened in my own lifetime would be classified a historical event (the first moon landing, Kennedy's assassination, etc.) but I guess it probably is. As for Dolemite, I think anything with Eddie Murphy is good. (I re-watched Beverly Hills Cop the other night.)
DeleteI remember going with my Dad to see the St Valentine's Day Massacre movie with my dad. This was 1967. I was 16. Perfect film to take your young son to, right? My dad didn't mind. And I didn't either.
DeleteAnyway, the actual massacre occurred in 1929, roughly 40 years earlier. From my dad's point of view, that likely wasn't historical, although it might have been memorable, depending on how much he followed the news. (He would have been as old back then during the actual event as I was sitting beside him in the theater.)
But for me, this was all cool stuff. Totally different cars and clothes, for starters. It was an entirely different world.
Oops. Needs editing. What else is new?
DeleteMarty, maybe 40 years needs to be our new lower limit, on how old stories/novels/movies should be in order be called historical fiction. (And hey, I bet you *didn't* mind--it was a cool movie.)
DeleteThanks for stopping in at SleuthSayers!
In the last few years, I've worked on a period heist novella set in the 1940's-1950's, it required some basic period research. But most of the focus was on the heist itself and the personal/social issue subverting it.
ReplyDeleteCongrats on Moonshine and Roses.
Thanks, Justin. That story was fun to write, and sounds as if your '40s/'50s story was too. Keep at it!!
DeleteI remember how, hmm, taken aback I felt the first time I heard my first novel, Death Will Get You Sober, which took forever to write and get published (in 2008), referred to as "a period piece," when it was set in "the present." But gradually I've come to accept that part of my lifetime (starting before the end of World War II, so pre-Boomer by a bit) is indeed "historical." The proof is not only how much things have changed since my childhood in the 1950s and the following decade or two but also how much I know that younger people, especially millennials, don't. My "real" historical series, set in the late 15th and early 16th century, includes both novels and short stories. The short stories are mysteries because I know how to write mystery short stories, and I've had a lot of fun continuing the history of my characters and learning more about their period and setting. But I'm also very comfortable writing standalone stories set in the 1950s, a period that younger writers have to research. I think it's fair to consider it "historical," even though I draw on my own memory, with an occasional foray into Google to check my facts. My cross-genre urban fantasy story "Stalker" was based on personal experience from my teens—in an era when nobody had heard of stalkers and everybody thought a boy being obsessed with a girl was hilarious—except the girl involved.
ReplyDeleteLiz, those of us who have been around a while do sometimes have an easier job doing research, don't we? A lot of news events that seem to have happened SO long ago are actually pretty fresh in my memory.
DeleteHere's something that made me realize how old I'm getting: I was watching Jeopardy last night and the video question was to identify a certain male actor. The photo the contestants were shown was of Robert Mitchum. Not a one of the three had any idea who he was. Whoa!
Thanks as always. (I love your fiction, whether it's set in the '50s or the 1500s.)
Exactly. Whoa, indeed. And back atcha!
DeleteThe only historical I've written wasn't historical when I started it.
ReplyDeleteIn 1972, a grad school class revived my desire to write, and I banged out a wretched MS inspired by a scandal in my own high school in 1964. The book went through many rejections and revisions, and I wrote a radical revision (much better) for my sixth-year grad project.
I drifted into theater and didn't write much until I retired from teaching. Then, in 2014, I self-published yet another revision of that MS as Postcards of the Hanging. By the time it appeared in print, the events that inspired it were 50 years old. Now they're 60.
Steve, I think this is you, right? Yep, Postcards of the Hanging is historical fiction. Hard to believe but true!!
DeleteJohn, I've enjoyed your historical mysteries and I have one or two in the pipe myself!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Jeff. I wish you the very best on your current submissions!
DeleteKeep me posted.
I will!
Delete