28 July 2021

Vikings


One of my embarrassing favorites is The Vikings, a Kirk Douglas picture from 1958, directed by Richard Fleischer. Fleischer had done 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea a couple of years before, with Douglas and James Mason, for Disney. 20,000 Leagues still gives me nightmares, that giant squid. The Vikings sticks to my ribs for different reasons.

Clearly, a lot of it is bogus. The wife accused of adultery, with her pigtails pinned to the wood stocks, and her husband throwing the axe. The guy loses his nerve, and Kirk steps in. (We know, and so does everybody else, that Kirk himself has been schtupping her.) But he saves her bacon. Then there’s the stuff that you figure was probably made up, but rings true. Kirk, again, dancing on the oars as the long boats make their way up the fjord. The story Dick Fleischer tells is that the stunt guys started walking the oars, and Douglas said he could do it, too. Fleischer is, Jesus, Mary, and Joseph, if you break your balls, the picture shuts down. Douglas goes ahead, and you can see it’s him, not a stunt double. And then the moment when Tony Curtis throws his hawk at Kirk, and the bird takes his eye out. These are guys who can inhabit a mutual hatred.

So, when The Vikings comes on TV, the TV Guide listing calls it “Incredible, but rousing, Norse mayhem.” I could cotton to that description. Borgnine is worth the price of admission. He’s about to be pushed into a pit of wolves. He turns to Tony Curtis and asks for a sword. Curtis gives him one, and Borgnine jumps into the pit, calling, “ODIN!” Is this remotely genuine? Who cares? The immediate result is that Curtis then gets his hand cut off. Fair is fair.

I thought I’d give Vikings a shot. It’s supposed to be significantly more authentic. The hair is certainly scary. But it’s all mayhem, all the time. I admit, when Ragnar takes Gabe Byrne down (spoiler alert, but you knew it was coming), it was thoroughly satisfying, but these people are portrayed, essentially, as brute psychopaths.

Excuse me. These are the guys who sailed out into the cold, dark Atlantic and discovered Iceland, and Greenland, and then the Canadian Maritimes, for European fisheries. They established Baltic trading posts. They raided England and Ireland, and the coast of France. Over time, they became not Vikings, a word that means pirates, but Normans. And they changed Europe.

Of the half-dozen books on history my grandfather wrote, two are still in print, and still taught in courses on the Middle Ages. The Renaissance of the 12th Century is the better-known, but The Normans in European History runs a close second. His thesis is that the Norsemen, who began as ravaging predators, turned into settlers, and governors. Normandy, the Kingdom of Sicily, the Crusader states.

The longest-lasting and most influential Norman adventure is of course the Conquest, in 1066, the defeat of the Saxon king Harold by the bastard duke William of Normandy.

There’s a straight line, leading to the Bayeux Tapestry and the Domesday Book. A legacy of those sea-raiders in their long boats, with their devotion to the Norse gods of war. Their striving, their fury in battle, their thirst for spoils, their fierce clan loyalties, and at the last, their hunger for Valhalla and an ever-lasting fame.

Incredible, yes, but rousing.


5 comments:

  1. Kassia St. Clair's book, The Golden Thread, how Fabric Changed History is most interesting on the Vikings. When you learn how much fabric had to be woven for their clothing and sails, you realize there was a lot of woman hours behind the Viking seamen.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'll never forget Tony Curtis in that movie. Not his finest hour.
    Meanwhile, yeah, the TV Vikings is for all the people who thought Game of Thrones didn't have enough mayhem, crazy hair, or sex.
    The real Vikings also founded Kievan Rus', i.e., 9th century Russia (Rus' apparently stems from "the rowers" or "fleet levy"), and are the ancestors of the royal houses of Russia.
    Truth is always stranger than fiction, isn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I’ve been reading an even more embarrassing series, Sarah Woodbury’s historical mysteries, in which the Danes who ruled and populated the Kingdom of Dublin in the 12th century play a significant part. But I already knew about them. Yep, viking was what they did for fun, not who they were as an ethnic group.

    ReplyDelete
  4. With a name like mine, you would have thought I'd have watched one production or the other, but I haven't. Yet.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hey David, have you read the late J.J. Norwich's essential "The Normans in Sicily: The Normans in the South 1016-1130 and the Kingdom in the Sun 1130-1194"? Two books in one and REQUIRED reading! Here's a link:

    https://www.amazon.com/Normans-Sicily-1016-1130-Kingdom-1130-1194/dp/0140152121/ref=sr_1_25?dchild=1&keywords=john+julius+norwich&qid=1628115897&sr=8-25

    ReplyDelete

Welcome. Please feel free to comment.

Our corporate secretary is notoriously lax when it comes to comments trapped in the spam folder. It may take Velma a few days to notice, usually after digging in a bottom drawer for a packet of seamed hose, a .38, her flask, or a cigarette.

She’s also sarcastically flip-lipped, but where else can a P.I. find a gal who can wield a candlestick phone, a typewriter, and a gat all at the same time? So bear with us, we value your comment. Once she finishes her Fatima Long Gold.

You can format HTML codes of <b>bold</b>, <i>italics</i>, and links: <a href="https://about.me/SleuthSayers">SleuthSayers</a>