A couple of things: Our serial killer was convicted of
killing two women, with three other probable - but probably unproveable
- female victims. He was a nasty piece of work. He kidnapped his victims,
tied them up to eye-bolts in his van, raped them, tortured them, and then, finally, killed them. He looked average: short and soft and
overweight and really unremarkable. The only thing that stood out about him was that in court he couldn't
keep a smirk off his face, which made everyone want to slap him silly.
Secondly, after talking to the Court Services Officer who interviewed
our serial killer, at length, I wrote the following:
The Conversation
Sitting on a cold, hard steel chair
while the endless story went on and on
like a drive-in triple feature,
murder, mayhem, knives in the dark,
only no buttered popcorn, no nudging bodies,
no smothered giggles or sudden gasps,
and the whole time his eyes were cold as ice.
Not even an eyebrow raised.
So at the end, with the tape recorder off,
all locked in for later listening,
the killer leaned over and asked,
“You gonna take it home? Listen to it late at night?
Dream a little dream of me?
I know, you're not shocked.
You’ve heard it all before, right?
Bet you’ve thought it all, too.
You pick up a roll of duct tape,
gonna do a little home repair, and then it comes,
all locked in for later listening,
the killer leaned over and asked,
“You gonna take it home? Listen to it late at night?
Dream a little dream of me?
I know, you're not shocked.
You’ve heard it all before, right?
Bet you’ve thought it all, too.
You pick up a roll of duct tape,
gonna do a little home repair, and then it comes,
sliding into your mind,
what else you can do with a roll of duct tape.
All it takes is a little imagination,
a little change of plan. Trying it out.
what else you can do with a roll of duct tape.
All it takes is a little imagination,
a little change of plan. Trying it out.
Or have you tried it out already?
Come on, you can tell me. Who’s gonna know?
Come on, you can tell me. Who’s gonna know?
We’re not that different, you know.
Not a lick between us.”
A blink like a lizard in a hot sun.
“Maybe not," he replied, “But I’m going home
and you’re staying here.”
and you’re staying here.”
“All that proves is you haven’t got caught yet.
Some night the dark side
will come right over you and drown you.
Does it to everyone. Even smart guys like you.
Cause we all want to drown, don’t we?”
Some night the dark side
will come right over you and drown you.
Does it to everyone. Even smart guys like you.
Cause we all want to drown, don’t we?”
The cold eyes bored into the killer.
“Don’t kid yourself,” he replied:
“A blind man doesn’t know what night is.
It’s just more of the same.
And that’s all you know; just more of the same.”
“A blind man doesn’t know what night is.
It’s just more of the same.
And that’s all you know; just more of the same.”
(c) Eve Fisher, 1998
Which brings me to the point that most criminals see themselves as different only in that they're the real deal: they've persuaded themselves that they're what we all want to be. They're smart, they're tough, they're brilliant, they're... wow! Never mind that they happen to be in custody, in jail, in prison, on death row. Everyone else is the idiot. Everyone else is the con.
In "East of Eden," John Steinbeck (talking about the villainess Cathy) writes that he believes that just as there are people who are born physically damaged, there are those who are born morally damaged - moral monsters. Or, as my husband and I put it, "everybody's got a piece missing." And the trouble is that very few people know what piece they have missing, because it's damn hard to tell from the inside. For example, if you're color blind, you could easily come to believe that all those people raving about that beautiful rich red are nuts. Or lying. Especially if there are a lot of other color blind people around you agreeing that you're right. Same with morality. Depending on the crowd you run with, it's real easy to believe that all that right/wrong/morality stuff is just another con. Because what they know is what they know, and it's always more of the same.
In "East of Eden," John Steinbeck (talking about the villainess Cathy) writes that he believes that just as there are people who are born physically damaged, there are those who are born morally damaged - moral monsters. Or, as my husband and I put it, "everybody's got a piece missing." And the trouble is that very few people know what piece they have missing, because it's damn hard to tell from the inside. For example, if you're color blind, you could easily come to believe that all those people raving about that beautiful rich red are nuts. Or lying. Especially if there are a lot of other color blind people around you agreeing that you're right. Same with morality. Depending on the crowd you run with, it's real easy to believe that all that right/wrong/morality stuff is just another con. Because what they know is what they know, and it's always more of the same.
Wonderful poem, Eve. And fascinating that the serial killer's self-congratulatory monologue, which we've read in the denouement of so many mysteries, occurs in real life.
ReplyDeleteActually, my experience is that a lot of criminals are happy to brag about their brilliant career to whoever will listen.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete